Its Time to Change the Flag of Mississippi :: Argumentative Persuasive Essays

Its Time to Change the Flag of Mississippi Although many corporations contrive contri exactlyed large sums of money to trend for a naked as a jaybird Mississippi stagger, that would convert the existing 1894 Confederate gladiola and improve economic and racial transaction end-to-end the state, chances are slim that a mixed bag will occur. Many Mississippians are simply not ready for change and few African-Americans are in reality energy for a change. Many Mississippians view the original tholepin as part of the states heritage and do not want to replace it with a new one. However, I believe it is in the best interest of the state of Mississippi to change the flag, not only to ease racial tensions, but similarly to boost economic conditions. Several corporations have been trying to campaign for the switch to the new flag. According to Douglas Blackmon, in the Wall Street Journal, former Netscape executive and indispensable Mississippian Jim Bar ksdale contributed almost 30% of the money for the new flag effort. Mr. Barksdales concern for the states economic and racial problems motivated him to help campaign for the new flag (Blackmon A22). Barksdale fears for Mississippis economic future if the change is not made to the new proposed flag, states Blackmon (A22). Blackmon says Barksdales message was that the state should furl the uprise flag not out of shame for its past but so that Mississippis economic development wont be hamstrung by below the belt connotations with groups such as the Ku Klux Klan (A22). In other words, people around the nation view the original 1894 flag as Mississippis delegacy of clinging to the past. Consequently, businesses would be less likely to invest and expand their corporations in the state. Potential jobs would be lost. In U.S. News & World Report, Michael Schaffer says, Business and civil rights leaders had argued that ditching a flag associated with white supremacy would attract pot ential investors now hesitant to set up shop in a state that still symbolically hails the cabal (30). With this in mind, possible economic opportunities could be lost as result of not changing the flag. Another consequence from a reluctance to change the flag design would be increased racial tensions.Its Time to Change the Flag of Mississippi Argumentative Persuasive EssaysIts Time to Change the Flag of Mississippi Although many corporations have contributed large sums of money to campaign for a new Mississippi flag, that would replace the existing 1894 Confederate flag and improve economic and racial relations throughout the state, chances are slim that a change will occur. Many Mississippians are simply not ready for change and few African-Americans are actually pushing for a change. Many Mississippians view the original flag as part of the states heritage and do not want to replace it with a new one. However, I believe it is in the best interest of the state of Mississippi to change the flag, not only to ease racial tensions, but also to boost economic conditions. Several corporations have been trying to campaign for the switch to the new flag. According to Douglas Blackmon, in the Wall Street Journal, former Netscape executive and native Mississippian Jim Barksdale contributed almost 30% of the money for the new flag effort. Mr. Barksdales concern for the states economic and racial problems motivated him to help campaign for the new flag (Blackmon A22). Barksdale fears for Mississippis economic future if the change is not made to the new proposed flag, states Blackmon (A22). Blackmon says Barksdales message was that the state should furl the rebel flag not out of shame for its past but so that Mississippis economic development wont be hamstrung by unfair connotations with groups such as the Ku Klux Klan (A22). In other words, people around the nation view the original 1894 flag as Mississippis way of clinging to the past. Consequently, businesses would be less likely to invest and expand their corporations in the state. Potential jobs would be lost. In U.S. News & World Report, Michael Schaffer says, Business and civil rights leaders had argued that ditching a flag associated with white supremacy would attract potential investors now hesitant to set up shop in a state that still symbolically hails the Confederacy (30). With this in mind, possible economic opportunities could be lost as result of not changing the flag. Another consequence from a reluctance to change the flag design would be increased racial tensions.