Knowledge Management Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 5000 words

Knowledge Management - Essay causeThus, contemporary KM theories can roughly be classified into three study categories 1. Technology- guidanceed primary focus on the enhancement of technologies that facilitate sharing/growth of companionship. 2. Organisational designing and reshaping the organisational environment in a authority to facilitate knowledge playes. 3. Ecological focus on the interaction process within the organisational environment involving people, knowledge and environmental factors (Gordon & Edge, 1997). A similar categorisation of the KM approaches is suggested in perhaps the only formal taxonomy of KM up to date. Michael Earl (2001) based his research on comprehensive empirical data to identify three major schools of KM Technocratic emphasis on information or technologies of KM.Economic knowledge should be managed similarly to otherwise assets (e.g. stock, bonds, etc).Behavioural focus on knowledge exchange as a fundamentally social process (p. 224).However, mo dern models and theories of models are often difficult to fit in this taxonomy due to their integrative nature which encompasses elements of separately school. The below overview provides some key concepts and theories associated with effective KM ashes. Main BodyOne popular KM approach widely used these days is a so-called pragmatic management. Though it is non classified in the Earls classical taxonomy pragmatic management is recently becoming increasingly popular, especially in the small to affection organisations. This approach seems rather close to Earls behavioural paradigm that views knowledge management and knowledge exchange as fundamentally social processes.The main difference of this paradigm lies in the fact that it doesnt imply serious investments in the employees and their all-round... this paper describes the basic idea of knowledge management which is universal doing what is needed to get the most out(a) of knowledge resources its practical implementation may vary in each particular case. The variations are not too serious and mostly concern the share of attention paid to either technological or human aspect of KM while the key principles remain similar in the modern models of KM explicit and tacit knowledge, interactive nature of KM processes, increased attention cognitive and motivational aspects of KM. Therefore, the differences in KM systems implemented are mostly associated with different organizational structures and demands of the companies. Although the challenges related to designing/implementation of effective KM strategy are serious the practice continues to demonstrate that they are not compelling. The most inherent of these challenges are identified in the professional literature as well as the alternative shipway and tools to cope with them.Tu sum up this paper approves that the major factors contributing to the failures of knowledge management strategies are extremely changeable global environment, coupled with failure to take a holistic approach to designing the system of knowledge management, and substantial resources required to design and implement a truly effective KM programme. Evidently, the low gear of these drawbacks has received better recognitions from the theorists whom develop KM models, programmes, and strategies for modern organisations.